Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:43
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
A reservoir of gold lies hidden in Earth’s core. Scientists say it’s leaking - CNN
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Citi Calls Time on Gold’s Rally Due to Slumping Demand, Fed Cuts - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Buzz Williams on what Maryland's playing style will be, learning the Big Ten and more - 247Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What is the general opinion of psychologists on Donald Trump's presidency?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why is there so much hate against black people?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
RPI researchers delighted when underwater volcano opened up beneath them - Times Union
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Vera Rubin quarter coin released by US Mint - BBC Sky at Night Magazine